Edited by Jamie (ScienceAid Editor), Taylor (ScienceAid Editor), SmartyPants
Introduction to Face Recognition
If you are shown a face, you might be able to give it a name straight away, but other times, although you know things about the person, you can't name them. The following terms are used to describe varying degrees of recognition:
- 1This is when you know you've seen the face before.Face recognition.Advertisement
- 2Trying to remember details about a face.'Face recall.
- 3Looking at a face and knowing who it is.Face identification.Advertisement
For the purposes of Psychology, and especially the law, we need to know how faces are recognized; and once we know this then eyewitness accounts of what a suspect looked like, could be improved.
Feature Analysis Theory
This is the first theory of face recognition. As its name suggests, you look at individual parts or features (nose, mouth, hair) of the face when trying to recognize or describe it. It is known as a bottom-up theory because you look at details first, and then the entire picture.
Below is the key study for this theory, it is by Shepherd, Davies, and Ellis (1981).
|Aim||To see how features are used when recalling unfamiliar faces.|
|Method||Participants were briefly shown faces of people they had never seen before and then had to describe the faces.|
|Results||The features most often recalled were (from most to least frequent): hair, eyes, nose, mouth, eyebrows, chin and forehead.|
|Conclusion||Faces of unfamiliar people tend to be recalled using the face's main features; this suggests we view faces as described in feature analysis theory.|
|Evaluation||Because of the nature of the experiment, that participants were asked to describe a face, would make them more likely to describe individual features, however, face recognition could work differently.|
This theory says we look at the face as a whole (i.e. spacing, overall shape), including stored information related to it. For example emotion (which is important when recognizing a friend or relative). It is said to be a top-down theory because you look at the bigger picture first.
Our key study for this theory is by Young and Hay.
|Aim||Find out how important layout of faces is when processing them.|
|Method||Pictures of famous faces were cut in half horizontally. Participants had to first identify the face from one-half. And in the second condition, the two halves were put together to make a composite.|
|Results||It took longer to recognize the composites than the halves.|
|Conclusion||In the composite condition, a new face composition was formed, thus making it more difficult to identify the two separate people.|
|Evaluation||There is always a problem with using 'famous' faces, since a face that is famous to one person may not be to another.|
Here, a famous experiment called the Thatcher illusion has been recreated, but using another former Prime Minister: Tony Blair. What differences do you notice between A and B
However, when you look at the images the correct way up; it becomes much more obvious what the difference is.
If you don't believe they are the same picture then just turn your head upside down! This suggests that faces are in fact viewed holistically because you do not detect that the eyes and mouth are inverted the first time around.
The general opinion in contemporary Psychology nowadays, is that the holistic form theory is the most appropriate. Since it takes account of, not only how we look at the face physically, but also the emotional response. This makes sense when looking at face recognition disorders.
Capgras Syndrome is caused by brain damage and sufferers recognize a familiar face but have no emotional response to it. This can make them believe their relatives are impostors. Indeed Blount (1986) cites a case when a man slit his father's throat because he was convinced he was a robot and was looking for the wires.
So in conclusion, and using evidence like the Thatcher illusion, Thompson (1980). We can say that there is a greater amount of evidence to support Holistic Form Theory as opposed to feature analysis.
Referencing this Article
If you need to reference this article in your work, you can copy-paste the following depending on your required format:
APA (American Psychological Association)
Face Recognition. (2017). In ScienceAid. Retrieved Apr 29, 2017, from https://scienceaid.net/psychology/cognition/face.html
MLA (Modern Language Association) "Face Recognition." ScienceAid, scienceaid.net/psychology/cognition/face.html Accessed 29 Apr 2017.
Chicago / Turabian ScienceAid.net. "Face Recognition." Accessed Apr 29, 2017. https://scienceaid.net/psychology/cognition/face.html.
Categories : Cognition
Recent edits by: Taylor (ScienceAid Editor), Jamie (ScienceAid Editor)